Some investors come to their senses – but is it too late?

Wednesday, November 19, 2008 8:28 - By The David
Posted in category investing

The AP published an article saying that investors are used to wild swings, and are no longer reacting with selling binges.

They tell the story of a few investors who have come to their senses…but are they really good examples?  Let’s take a look.

One investor said:

I certainly had a queasy stomach throughout October,” said the 61-year-old retired lawyer from Vancouver, B.C. “I had to keep saying to myself … These things will pass.

The article goes on to say that “now he’s feeling better….”

Sounds great, doesn’t it?  But let’s take a closer look and see what Mr. Bass did when he wasn’t so calm.

During the darkest days of the stock market’s slide last month, Jack Bass withdrew stock from his retirement accounts

I know Mr. Bass is older, but selling when stocks are crashing can be a deadly mistake. 

Let’s take a look at another of their relaxed investors.

An avid investor from Providence, R.I., isn’t feeling the anxiety he did a few weeks ago at the height of the market scare…

Another good start!  It sounds like he has stopped reacting emotionally, and is thinking of the big picture.  But let’s read some more just to make sure:

…when he shifted $50,000 from stocks to cash in his 401(k) account.

By selling at the height of the scare, he realizes his losses at the worst time.  He may think his funds will continue to drop indefinitely, but it’s more likely that he’s just reacting emotionally, rather than considering any long term implications.

According to tradingsphere.com, most investors tend to sell low and buy high, not because of rational decisions, but because of human psycology and the tendency to chase yesterday’s hot returns.

If that’s not enough, smartmoney.com takes it a step further and says:

An overwhelming impulse to get out, cash out, hide out; it’s all-too human. That’s why it’s a grave error. Emotional investors are poor investors. They buy high and sell low. Today’s market swoon is just the latest perfect trap to lock in losses. Don’t do it.

It goes on to say that if you have two to five years to ride out the downturn, you should stick it out.  After all, when you chose an investment strategy, it was (presumably) a rational, well thought out decision.  You should not abandon your game plan when things start going downhill.

If your strategy needs updating, you still should not pull out en masse.  Instead, take a disciplined approach and adjust your investments over time.  It’s another example of dollar cost averaging.  By changing your allocation over regular intervals, you can protect yourself from fluctuations in the market.

The bottom line is that your investment strategy should not depend on wild swings.  It should be based off of long term perfomance.  If your strategy needs adjusting, it should be done gradually and rationally - not as a knee jerk, emotional reaction to the latest financial news.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Tipd
  • Digg
  • TwitThis
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Propeller
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
You can leave a response below, or trackback from your own site.
  • Motevator,


    I agree! It's better to check the market too infrequently rather than watch it non-stop. People who are overloaded with financial news tend to have worse returns than those that check once a month or less.



    And to elaborate on your point, if I spent weeks studying historical data before deciding on an investment strategy, I'm not going to change my plans overnight. It's best to be calm when you make any decisions in life.
  • Very often the best thing to do in times of financial panic is nothing. Turn the TV off. Go for a walk. If you're going to make a big financial change, don't do it when you're sweating and short of breath!
  • Good article! I wanted to see if you might want to be a contributor for our site, www.erollover.com .

    We are looking for content contributors, and it could get some exposure for your site.

    Also, please check out our article submission section for bloggers that helps to create good backlinks for the search engines to pick up your site. http://www.erollover.com/artic...

    Just email me back at info@erollover.com

    Thanks, Mike Rowan
  • Jack - "I have full faith in our economy to begin making poor decisions again." Hilarious!
  • Jack - completely agree with you that emotion dominates most trading decisions. I also agree that 2-5 years may not be enough for the market to recover, and even if it was, it would probably be unsustainable. I'm guessing that the 2-5 years figure was based off of normal market cycles, but there's nothing normal about what's been happening recently. And just to clarify- I'm not suggesting that people blindly hold onto investments until they make their money back (that would be emotional investing). All I'm trying to say is that if you analyze your investments and allocations rationally, and still think they're a good investment, you probably should continue to hold, even if they decline in the short term.
  • Patrick
    Jack, you and this article are right about how the stock market is based on emotional decisions. History proves that people make idiototic choices and I don't think that our economic situation will bring intellegence to the masses. I have full faith in our economy to begin making poor decisions again.
  • Jack
    This seems to suggest that stock buying/selling decisions should be caused by emotionality. However, that is precisely what the stock market is based upon. In the recent bull market, when prices were far higher than the P/E ratios of companies being traded, all purchases were inspired by the ebullient mood of the investor crowd, an irrational belief that the market could only continue to go up. To buy overvalued stocks was just as emotional a position as it is to sell devalued stocks, but as long as everybody is doing it and you're making money, it seems like a smart thing to do. To think that people should hold on to stocks as their previously high prices would return in five years or so is simply to say, "They will once again be absurdly overvalued."

    Also, the current financial crisis may prove to be more than a mere correction. Prices rose in the 2002 - 2007 period not just because of investor confidence, but because of the creation of derivatives----where imprudent financial manipulators created more fictitious money than all of the "real" money in the entire world! The collapse of this house-of-cards is what is causing the precipitous downfall of the global economy. Since the recent prosperity was built upon credit and vast sums of money created out of nothing, a return in five years to recent highs would require an equally irrational system based upon borrowing.
blog comments powered by Disqus